

aiR for Privilege is an AI-powered solution that uses generative AI, large language models, natural language processing, machine learning, and social network graphs to analyze documents and predict whether they are privileged or not and provide a draft privilege log description. This streamlines privilege review, improves the accuracy of your final privilege calls, and reduces overhead when creating a privilege log.
aiR for Privilege retains an understanding of privilege specific to an organization to drive greater consistency in privilege calls across matters and speed up the pace of privilege review.
Note: aiR for Privilege locates attorney-client privileged communications and documents subject to the attorney work-product doctrine, as understood under US standards and laws. It is up to the user of aiR for Privilege to decide whether this criteria and the results meet applicable requirements.
Note: Azure OpenAI does not retain any data from the documents being analyzed. Data you submit for processing by Azure OpenAI is not retained beyond your organization’s instance, nor is it used to train any other generative AI models from Relativity, Microsoft, or any other third party. For more information, see the white paper A Focus on Security and Privacy in Relativity’s Approach to Generative AI.
Note: For European Economic Area (EEA) customers, aiR for Privilege data may be processed elsewhere in the EU, but it will always be processed in compliance with applicable laws. For more information, please contact your account manager.
The table below illustrates the high-level workflow and the role that should be performing each step for aiR for Privilege:
Role | Step | Workflow Step |
---|---|---|
Project Manager | 1 | Create a saved search of documents that you want to analyze for privilege |
2 | Create an aiR for Privilege project | |
3 | Upload any lists of Known Attorneys and Known Law Firms to jump-start the AI’s understanding | |
4 | Run each aiR for Privilege pipeline step | |
Annotator | 5 | Confirm AI Predictions through Annotations during each pipeline step |
Case SME | 6 | Finalize which Law Firms and Attorneys are Privilege Conferring, Privilege Neutral, or Privilege Breaking |
Project Manager | 7 | Generate Privilege Predictions and Draft Privilege Log Descriptions |
Case SME | 8 | Finalize privilege decisions and log descriptions through targeted quality check (QC) |
9 | Produce with confidence |
For more information about the different aiR for Privilege roles see Roles and security permissions.
Following are requirements for using aiR for Privilege:
Following are limitations to consider when using aiR for Privilege:
aiR for Privilege is a usage-based product, meaning you pay-per-use. Charges are per Document Unit. A Document Unit is equal to one Relativity document.
After clicking the Run button on the Prepare Project pipeline step, Relativity estimates the number of Document Units you’ll use for this project. You can then decide to continue or cancel the step.
After completing the Prepare Project pipeline step Relativity will charge you for the number of Document Units. The price per Document Unit may vary. Your RelativityOne contract defines the price.
Note: You may have included aiR for Privilege Document Units to trial the product without any cost. After you use your Included aiR for Privilege Document Units, Relativity will charge per Document Unit.
The Brain stores past Annotator Decisions made on Disclaimers, Spammers, Domains, Equivalent Domains, and Entities and applies them to new projects. This accelerates annotation time and ensures consistency across the final document predictions that the AI makes.
The Brain contains three levels:
The Universal Brain includes data that Relativity has gathered from publicly available source (e.g. the domain lawfirm.com is a Law Firm domain as found on an AMLAW 100 list). No user data is stored in the Universal Brain.
Upon the completion of a project, aiR for Privilege will store Annotator Decisions made on Disclaimers, Spammers, Domains, Equivalent Domains, and Entities from that project in a Client Brain. The Client Brain is associated with the Client object linked to the workspace. Any future project, in a workspace associated with that Client object, will have the opportunity to use annotator decisions stored in that Client Brain to be automatically applied when those same items (Disclaimers, Spammers, etc.) are identified, resulting in fewer required annotations and greater consistency in final document predictions between matters.
Note: The Client Brain does not store Final Privilege Status decisions made on Domains and Entities (“Privilege Conferring”, “Privilege Neutral”, “Privilege Breaking".)
When an Annotator Decision stored in the Client Brain is applied to an item in a new workspace, that item will receive a Source field value of Client Brain. This will give you transparency that the Client Brain was used for that item, while still allowing you to have the control to overturn that prior Annotator Decision locally within this workspace.
In Workspace 1 which is connected to Client Object 1 a user annotates the John Doe entity as Legal Role. When John Doe is found in Workspace 2 which is also connected to Client Object 1, John Doe will be pre-populated with the Legal Role Annotator Decision and given a Source value of Client Brain.
See General settings in a workspace for more details on enabling the Client Brain and selecting which Client Brain you would like to apply to a project.
The Matter Brain will store not only Annotator Decisions made on Disclaimers, Spammers, Domains, Equivalent Domains, and Entities, but also Final Privilege Status decisions (“Privilege Conferring”, “Privilege Neutral”, “Privilege Breaking”) on Domains and Entities for a project and apply those decisions to new projects in the same workspace. When a new project locates an item (Disclaimer, Spammer, etc.) that was already identified in a prior project in that same workspace it will not create a new item, but rather link the new project to that existing item (on the Privilege Project field) and take that item’s Annotator Decision and Final Privilege Status as truth for analysis. This eliminates repetitive annotation and drives consistency across final document decisions within the matter.
In Project 1 a user annotates the John Doe entity as Legal Role and Privilege Conferring. When John Doe is found in Project 2 in the same workspace that same John Doe object will be linked to Project 2 on the Privilege Project field and the existing Legal Role and Privilege Conferring decisions will be used for making final Document predictions.
The Matter Brain is always enabled and cannot be disabled.
Why was this not helpful?
Check one that applies.
Thank you for your feedback.
Want to tell us more?
Great!